Yvonne Fletcher Murdered in Saint James Square by Zionists

Many people believe that the current Zionist crusade against Islam started in the immediate aftermath of the 9-11 attack on the World Trade Center in New York, but they are wrong. Others believe that the assassination of President John F. Kennedy was the most devastating and effective single murder of the 20th century, but they also are wrong. To understand why this is so, and to be able to discriminate between events that initiate global change and those that are mere glitzy media spectaculars, it is essential to remain emotionally detached. Kennedy was only a politician, who was swiftly replaced within hours by another politician. His death did not lead to a war with Cuba or Russia, nor did it lead to any massed western determination to hunt down or punish his perceived killers.

The current Zionist crusade against Islam started in the immediate aftermath of WPC Yvonne Fletcher's murder in St. James Square, cynically orchestrated the same year as George Orwell's famous and chilling book "1984", in which Big Brother controls global citizens by television, and where the 'Ministry of Truth' reconstructs the past in order to manipulate the future. Less than two hours after Yvonne Fletcher was gunned down, western television started reconstructing the events of that morning, in order to create a new future filled with hatred of Libyans, who were used as proxy Muslims representative of Islam as a whole.

Because WPC Fletcher's death initiated a massive western backlash against Libya, which in turn facilitated the later murders of tens of thousands more Muslim women and children in the Middle East, Yvonne's was by far the most devastating and effective single murder of the 20th Century. With three high velocity bullets costing less than two dollars, fired in a covert operation lasting less than one second, Zionist media puppeteers deliberately drove an enormous dividing wedge of distrust and animosity between millions of Christians and Muslims.

For nearly twenty years I have kept the full details of my personal relationship to Hughes Corporation, to Enserch House at 8 St. James Square, and to those who ordered Yvonne Fletcher's murder under fairly tight wraps. I really did believe that discreet dialogue with a range of senior British officials would do more in terms of achieving justice for Yvonne Fletcher, for members of her family, and for her former colleagues in the Metropolitan Police Service. Then quite suddenly, on 10 February 2004, Prime Minister Tony Blair opened his very big mouth, and all bets were instantly off.

In an official announcement, the media was advised that Tony Blair would meet Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi in Tripoli later this year, but only if Libya first "accepted responsibility" for WPC Fletcher's murder in St. James Square, and surrendered her alleged killers to the west for trial. This artful statement was followed by a faint obsequious echo from New Scotland Yard, when Metropolitan Police Federation chairman Glen Smyth meekly offered, "There must be no normalization of relations with Libya until they hand over those responsible for the murder". Obviously nothing has changed in the slightest, and the letters I have received over the years from senior Home Office officials, and Assistant Commissioners at New Scotland Yard promising full and proper investigations, are not worth the paper they are written on.

Within two weeks of Blair's imperious announcement, it became obvious that I was not alone in thinking this matter had to be properly resolved once and for all. On 24 February 2004, newly appointed Libyan Prime Minister Shokri Ghanem stated very clearly that his country was not responsible for WPC Fletcher's murder, or for the bombing of Pan American Flight 103 in December 1988, but had paid compensation because it was the only way to 'buy peace'. Unlike his lackluster predecessors, Shokri Ghanem is a streetwise politician with detailed knowledge of Zionist blackmail techniques, and was making it very clear that Libya would not tolerate any more of them in the future.

"After the sanctions and after the problems we [Libya] have been facing because of the sanctions, the loss of money, we thought that it was easier for us to buy peace and this is why we agreed a compensation," Ghanem said in the interview, recorded in Libya. Asked whether the payment of compensation did not mean any acceptance of guilt by Libya, Ghanem replied: "I agree with that, and this is why I say we bought peace."

Before we look at exactly how Yvonne Fletcher was murdered, and examine the various investigations that followed over the years, it is first necessary to establish my personal standing within the Hughes corporate pecking order. Experience over the years has proved that unless I do so now, the Zionist media will start a whispering vilification campaign against me, claiming I was merely an office boy with a grudge, and had no real knowledge of strategic matters or events at 8 St. James Square.

The two letters displayed below prove that I reported directly to the two most senior vice presidents of Hughes Corporation on a first-name basis, and was actively engaged in cost cutting measures at the corporate level. As any multinational expert will confirm independently, this verifies my senior management status within the organization. All junior staff are handled by middle managers way below vice presidential level. The dates on the two letters also prove that I was directly involved with Hughes Corporation at 8 St. James Square, during the critical period 2 April 1984 to 24 January 1985. To read either full-size letter, click on the appropriate image, then click "back" to return to this page.

Though I was not directly involved in the covert side of the business, it must be said that during 1984 there were some very spooky people working at 8 St. James, surrounded by iron-clad security that would have given Fort Knox a good run for its money. First there was Enserch Corporation with known links to the Israeli Mossad, headed by Vice President Frank Maier. Then there was Hughes Corporation with known links to the CIA, headed by Vice President Jim Bodhaine. Last but not least were two active-service CIA agents, whose presence was certainly known to the Home Office and Metropolitan Police Service, because both were licensed firearms holders

All covert operations involve deception and subtlety to a greater or lesser degree, and the operation planned for St. James was a masterful combination of both. The police present that day were briefed that a group of anti-Qadhafi demonstrators would be cordoned on the inner pavement of the Square, enabling them to demonstrate peacefully against Libyan staff situated in their embassy across the road at number five. As with all such briefings the police were told to keep both factions apart, with the dividing line being the road itself. Since there were only two groups opposing each other, it was 'obvious' that if a member of one of the two groups was injured, the other group would be responsible. So when Yvonne Fletcher was shot in the vicinity of the anti-Qadhafi demonstrators, the immediate assumption was that she must have been shot from the Libyan Embassy. Precise timing and confusing echoes reverberating around St. James Square, deliberately made it seem as though there was no other possibility.

Two professional television cameras hired by the Libyans were filming at the time, one located outside the Embassy at 5 St James, and the other outside 7 St James. In ballistics terms the footage from those two cameras provides most of the hard scientific proof needed to prove the shots could not have been fired by the Libyans, and confirms the firing platform was located in a building on the northern side of the square, well to the west of the Libyan Embassy. Forensic details from Yvonne Fletcher's post mortem provide the balance of irrefutable scientific evidence.

The Libyans knew in advance that several busloads of demonstrators were being imported from Manchester for a major demonstration, but they did not know why, hence the broadcast-quality television cameras hired from Worldwide News Services to provide a detailed record of events for the Libyan security service. In direct contrast, media crews from the BBC and ITN were ordered by their Zionist bosses to stay away. Though the BBC and ITN normally recorded all minor 'controversial' Muslim events, right down to a single worshipper praying to Mecca from his British place of work, the known forthcoming major demonstration in St. James Square on 17 April 1984 was placed strictly off limits.

Rather like the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, the Zionist intent was to ensure their the covert operation would not be accidentally 'blown' later by any incriminating film or video footage which might reveal, for example, muzzle flashes in the wrong place, or injured people falling in impossible directions. It would also have been a major catastrophe if a western media crew had accidentally strayed into the line of fire from 8 St. James Square, thereby compromising the entire covert operation. The Zionists had two television crews on standby waiting to record emotionally supercharged images of the dead or dying WPC Yvonne Fletcher arriving at Westminster Hospital, but that was all.

Every frame of television footage you have ever seen about the murder of Yvonne Fletcher in St. James Square, is sourced back to those two Worldwide News cameras, and the Libyan Government holds copyright on every inch of the footage. The decision to hire Worldwide News was inspired, because unlike Dallas, the footage from these two cameras proves conclusively what really happened that day, and despite feeble Zionist protestations to the contrary, it always will.

Early on 17 April, crowd barriers were placed round the central garden pavements of St James Square, and also along the pavement to the east and west of the Libyan Embassy, providing a clear buffer zone occupied only by police officers. The anti-Qadhafi demonstrators were ushered behind the barriers in the inner square at 10.15 am and a gazetted police officer then personally positioned twenty police constables, including WPC Yvonne Fletcher, in an arc facing the inner square. Significantly, although there were more than fifty police personnel present in the Square, Yvonne Fletcher, the shortest and lightest constable in the entire Metropolitan Police Service, was the only female officer present.

As the constable with the lightest body weight facing multiple demonstrators of considerable bulk, every policing and riot control regulation says the gazetted officer should have positioned Yvonne well out on one of the flanks, but he did not do so. Yvonne Fletcher was deliberately positioned on the apex of the curve in front of the Libyan Embassy, directly in the chosen line of fire from 8 St James Square.

Just four minutes later at 10.19 am a 3-shot burst of automatic fire rang out. Yvonne Fletcher was hit by the first bullet in her upper right back. Bullet entry angle was 60 degrees from the horizontal, with an exit wound visible below the left rib cage. If the entry and exit wounds are lined up with her known height, and her televised position when the shots were fired, the line of fire backtracks precisely to the top floor of 8 St James Square. No other building in St James Square is high enough or at the correct azimuth to facilitate the sixty-degree downward shot. At the coronial inquest into her death, creative media deception 'proved' that Yvonne Fletcher was killed by a shot fired from the first floor of the Libyan Embassy, on her left-hand side at only 15 degrees from the horizontal!

Back in 1996 I wrote a paper on this, aimed primarily at forensic and ballistics experts, which has now been moved to the bottom of this new page as a technical appendix. Not everyone is interested in the sometimes confusing science of how bullets fly through the air, or what sort of damage they do when they eventually hit their targets. Suffice to say that when the deception was uncovered publicly back in 1996, the Zionists went into denial, claiming that my truth was a lie [Big Brother again], and that instead of being killed by a 150-grain bullet travelling at nearly 3,000 feet per second, Yvonne Fletcher was in fact killed by a puny little silenced 115-grain pistol bullet, traveling at only 900 feet per second.

Put simply, the assault bullet that killed Yvonne was so heavy and moving so fast, that it entered through her upper right back and then tore down through the center of her body, destroying all of the organs that got in its way, eventually exiting below her left rib cage with enough energy to damage Yvonne's left elbow. Now try to visualize this bullet as a runaway five-ton truck that roars in through the front wall of your house at 60 miles per hour, smashes its way through the corridor, and then knocks out your back door. Fine, of course it would, but the Zionists are now trying to make you believe that the five-ton truck was really only a Volkswagen Beetle sedan, crawling along at a pitiful 20 miles per hour. Are you really going to believe this pathetic Orwellian rubbish?

It is a fact that readers who have never visited St. James Square personally, will probably have significant difficulty visualizing any of the multiple events that happened in different places at slightly different times, but there is a way around this. Shown below are two small photomontages, overlaid on properly scaled maps drawn by the local council in Westminster. To view the giant photomontage that each represents, click on either small image and wait for its big brother to load in your browser. When you are finished, click "back" to return to this page.

The question has to asked whether the objective of the covert operation was simply to splatter a few demonstrators with shards of shrapnel, which would have been enough to swing public opinion against Libya. Perhaps the operation simply went wrong and Yvonne Fletcher was killed by mistake? No. The sound track analysis and film footage prove she was hit by the first shot in the 3-shot burst. The first shot in an automatic burst always hits its target, before the weapon "walks" slightly due to recoil effect. Therefore the assault rifle sights were lined-up directly on Yvonne Fletcher's back when the shooter squeezed the trigger.

There is plenty more proof of pre-meditation and the need for an exact field of fire, starting with the masked demonstrators themselves, who were deliberately brought in by bus from a city hundreds of miles to the north of London. Are we to believe that on 17 April 1984 there were no anti-Qadhafi demonstrators available locally in London?

Of course there were, but they were not told the covert demonstration was going to happen outside the Libyan Embassy, and were thus unable to attend. The last thing the Zionists wanted was a horde of unruly [but genuine] anti-Qadhafi demonstrators bursting through the police barriers, thereby blocking the view of Yvonne Fletcher's unprotected back from the shooter on the top floor of Enserch House, 8 St. James Square.

Hours after Yvonne's death, when the counter-terrorist squadron of the Special Air Service arrived by helicopter from Hereford, its members were advised by a gazetted police officer that the shots were fired from the Libyan Embassy at 5 St James Square. Good though the SAS normally is at countering terrorists in multiple environments, this wildly inaccurate police information made it impossible for the Squadron to successfully track down Yvonne Fletcher's ruthless killers.

There are few things more sacred to the British public than the safety of its proudly unarmed police force. The murder of a young unarmed policewoman on the streets of London immediately generated feelings of intense loathing in the British public towards the Libyans as the supposed killers. Unfortunately the public remained blissfully unaware of the real culprits, as the horrifying sight of Yvonne Fletcher dying was beamed across Britain into millions of homes.

Police Special Branch and MI5 had suspicions of course. The shots rang out for no obvious reason, and all seasoned officers understood only too well that for the Libyans to kill an unarmed policewoman in broad daylight on a London street was tantamount to committing diplomatic suicide. Making the task even harder for police was their exclusion from the first three days of COBRA intelligence meetings after the murder, chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister, while Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was out of the country on an official visit to Portugal.

It was an entirely critical time when the police were in hot pursuit of the murderer of an unarmed British policewoman, and they had every right to storm the Libyan People's Bureau in order to search for evidence. Indeed the police wanted to storm the building, but permission was refused by the Chairman of COBRA. This is another man who must be thoroughly interrogated or punished, because storming the Libyan Embassy when the police wanted to, would have proved conclusively that no shots were fired from there at all. There was no logical reason nor legal impediment to stop them, so why did the Chairman of COBRA use his enormous power to deliberately block correct police procedure?

Members of the SIS [MI6] at the Foreign Office were demonstrably certain that Yvonne Fletcher was not killed by Libyans located in the Embassy, because after a creative media feeding frenzy and a bloodless siege that lasted until 22 April 1984, Britain broke off diplomatic relations with Libya and ordered the occupants of the Embassy to leave the country within seven days. They departed on 27 April, with no suspects being arrested or charged with her murder. Immediately after their departure the Libyan Embassy was entered and searched from top to bottom by military clearance experts looking for booby traps, weapons and ammo. Despite an exhaustive search of every nook and cranny in the building, nothing was found, a fact reported by the media the next day.

It was not until 2 May 1984, five days after the extensive military search, that the Metropolitan Police suddenly 'found' 4,367 rounds of 9-mm and .22 caliber ammunition, 7 pistols, two Sterling pistol grips and two Sterling magazines in the Libyan Embassy. On the face of it, 'Mr. Plod' had suddenly become much more skilled at finding concealed weapons and ammunition than the premier military explosive clearance team.

Who was fooling who? If the weapons and ammo were Libyan property they would certainly have been loaded into one of the 18 Libyan diplomatic bags which left the country unopened. Critically though, no Sterling sub-machine guns or 7.62-mm high velocity assault rounds were planted in the Libyan building to be later 'found' by the Metropolitan Police. There were sound reasons for this. Any complete Sterling sub-machine gun could be tested ballistically by forensic scientists, an event that had to be avoided at all costs because it would have exposed the deception; and 7.62-mm assault rounds had to be excluded because WPC Fletcher was notionally murdered with a low velocity 9-mm parabellum round: a fraudulent 'fact' officially recorded at the inquest into her death.

The situation became more confusing in April 1985, when on the first anniversary of Yvonne Fletcher's pre-meditated murder, BBC2 Television ran a documentary in which an amateur video film of the demonstration was shown for the first time. The amateur camera allegedly recorded the sound of a 12-shot Sterling sub-machine gun burst, which concurred nicely with the coronial inquest findings of May 1984, and appeared to explain the inexplicable: eleven fired 9-mm bullets found by the Police during a search of St James conducted 10 days after the murder, in which time period the crime scene was not secured. Add to that the 9-mm bullet which allegedly killed Yvonne Fletcher but was not recovered from her body, and we have a neat figure of 12 rounds to match the forged video footage.

The amateur video footage provides an object lesson in how not to use forged evidence in an attempt to pervert the course of justice. The audio of a Sterling firing an 12-shot burst is real enough, but it was not recorded in St James Square, nor on the morning of the 17th April 1984 when Yvonne Fletcher was murdered. How is it possible to prove this? By relying on hard science and ignoring misleading Zionist media hype. Immediately before the murder, one of the professional cameramen filmed the front facade of the Libyan building, which was crossed diagonally by a clear shadow line cast by the sun. The exact time was accurately calculated using survey techniques and astronomical data from the Greenwich Observatory in London.

The forged amateur footage also shows a sun line diagonally crossing the front of the Libyan building, but unfortunately it is in the wrong place and at the wrong angle for 10.19 am on the morning of 17 April 1984. More convincing for the layman reader is the car parked in front of the Embassy. On the professional video the car is an unoccupied blue Peugeot sedan with its bonnet positioned between the two windows to the left of the Bureau entrance. On the blatantly forged amateur video, the unoccupied blue Peugeot sedan magically transforms itself into a white station wagon, starts its own engine, then drives itself five feet closer to the Libyan Embassy front door.

For forensic scientists there are a staggering number of other errors on the footage providing 100% proof of forgery, including the sun shadow line failing to shade the bonnet of the "new" white station wagon; the green Libyan flag vanishing from the pole above the Embassy front door, and a tall black street light to the right of the Bureau disappearing completely. There is no doubt the forged footage was prepared in order to forever cement the reversed Orwellian media "truth" in the minds of the British Parliament and people. Anyone daring to challenge this reverse media 'truth' would be patted indulgently on the head and given a copy of the BBC2 film, complete with the damning forged amateur video footage 'proving' the Libyans fired an entirely imaginary Sterling sub-machine gun burst that day.

Ultimately the ploy failed. Unwittingly perhaps, the filmmakers proved their own video footage was deliberately forged, and thus in turn proved they were accessories after the fact to the murder of an unarmed British policewoman on the streets of London. WPC Yvonne Joyce Fletcher, ruthlessly sacrificed on television at the age of twenty-five, was laid to rest at her local village church in the county of Wiltshire with full police honours. One of her more cynical mourners was the very same man who denied Yvonne's superiors the right to enter the Bureau at 5 St James Square, and prove no shots were fired by the Libyans that day: The Chairman of COBRA.

As we will shortly discover this was not the end of the matter, but first we need to take a brief detour in order to try to understand the psychology of murderers prepared to cold-bloodedly shoot an unarmed woman in the back on the streets of London. Obviously we are looking at certifiable psychotics who think they are God, and Zionism itself is a geopolitical ideology which claims a dominant role for Jews in the Middle East.

Within Jewish Zionism a book called the Talmud reigns supreme, and makes very clear that all non-Jews are vermin to be exterminated, including women and children. The best example of this insane law that I can think of is current Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. During 1956, Sharon was interviewed by General Ouze Merham, and the quote below is verbatim, not edited by me in any way. The sacred Talmud itself confirms that where Ariel Sharon refers to women as 'Palestinians' or 'Arabs', religious law interprets this to mean all non-Jewish females.

"I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian childs existence infers that generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him.

"With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian women is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do." [Media Monitors]

During the early nineties, as my independent investigation into Yvonne Fletcher's murder gathered pace, there was a steadily increasing level of interest at both at the official and unofficial levels. A small number of politicians in London showed a willingness to expose the truth of what happened that day, and not long after that, a group of mostly retired [non-Muslim] military personnel approached me, asking if they might also assist by using their own highly individual contacts.

This approach by military personnel was unexpected, and I did what I could to check their very impressive credentials through back channels. So far as I was able to establish, these men were telling the truth when they stated their primary goal was to protect British and American national security. Then, as requested over a period of several months, I provided the names and last known addresses of every individual I knew who was linked to Enserch House, 8 St. James Square during 1984, no matter how remote or tenuous that linkage might be.

News of the military group was then deliberately leaked to the Zionists in London, in a process apparently referred to as 'shaking the tree'. What this means in real terms is that because they started it, those who controlled the leak were able to discreetly observe reactions in the target group, then monitor and record who interacted with who, before finally observing and logging target actions taken in an attempt to neutralize or destroy the new perceived threat. By all accounts, the leak controllers did not have long to wait.

As mentioned earlier in this report, the only thing holding the 'official' story of Yvonne's murder together was pure western media propaganda, with the authentic Worldwide News footage from St. James always lurking in the background, as a constant threat to this contrived misinformation. Basically the target Zionists were in a deadly trap, with the only weapon at their disposal being more media propaganda. Less than six months after the leak, a British television network had an apparently overwhelming spontaneous desire to revisit the Yvonne Fletcher story, but this time the identities of those responsible were logged, and their actions observed every inch of the way.

During 1994, this crowd of ruthless Zionist manipulators ordered a minor documentary maker to convince Yvonne's mother, Queenie Fletcher, that she should go to Libya and demand the identities of her daughter's killers. From the Zionist media viewpoint it was a master stroke. They would drag Queenie away from her daughter's grave in Wiltshire, and then fly her all the way to Tripoli, thereby placing her in a completely different cultural environment which would confuse and probably even scare her. In turn the Libyans would be totally confused and look as guilty as hell, because they obviously had no idea who killed Yvonne either. Thus the 'official' story was creatively reinforced and put to air on British television during July '94.

One year later in 1995 things started to heat up even more, with various strange people contacting me and even visiting me in Perth, a distance of some 8,000 miles away from their London offices. One of these was a producer from filmmaker Fulcrum Productions, more interested in discovering the extent of my knowledge in the case than making a serious film about Yvonne Fletcher's creative murder. Large hypothetical sums of money were mentioned as an inducement, though they were never paid. Back in London Fulcrum's offices were apparently bugged, and all interactions with prominent Zionists noted and added to the running logs. Slowly but surely a huge unofficial quasi-military database of the guilty parties was constructed for future use, and most of us sat back waiting for the next burst of Zionist propaganda from Fulcrum, due to go to air in Britain during mid-April 1996.

A few of the military folk still active in the field monitoring the movements of various important Zionists, couldn't fail to notice that Frank Maier, by then President of Enserch Corporation, responsible for all oil drilling in Israel, was suddenly offered a late place on a flying visit to the Balkans with U.S. Commerce Secretary Ron Brown. Equally suddenly, the U.S. Military High Command changed aircraft from the normal C-130 Hercules fitted with decoy flares, which were absolutely essential for safe flight in Balkans airspace, to a military Boeing 737 from Germany without decoy flares.

During night approach to Cilipi airport at Dubrovnik on 3 April 1996, the ground navigation aids were allegedly interfered with, leading to the unsuspecting Boeing crew being decoyed overhead a tall mountain range, placing the aircraft within easy range of shoulder launched heat seeking missiles. Local eyewitnesses claim to have seen the dazzling white exhausts of two such weapons, only seconds before they blew both podded engines off the Boeing's wings, turning it into an awkward glider that immediately crashed into the mountain.

Stunned and highly suspicious about the actual nature of the crash, civilian American crash investigators were flown to Dubrovnik three days later, with the main target of their investigation the man with responsibility for Cilipi airport's electronic navigation aids - Chief Maintenance Officer Niko Jerkuic. Sadly, less than one hour before his prearranged interrogation, Mr Jerkuic died from a single .45 caliber shot to the chest, fired at very close range. So we will never really know whether the Boeing 737 crash was the result of foul play, or an unfortunate accident. Either way, it was a terrible waste of a patriotic United States Air Force crew.

Between 1992 and the present day, Frank Maier is only one of four people associated with WPC Yvonne Fletcher's murder, or the later media cover up, to die in suspicious circumstances. In my casual view, many more will die before their traditionally allotted three score years and ten, because there are nowadays thousands of very angry people out there, who realise the magnitude and significance of the crime committed in St. James Square nearly twenty years ago. Making the situation even more dangerous for the Zionists and their lackeys, is the fact that many of these angry folk are already well-trained in the military arts normally practiced by Special Forces.

As expected the Fulcrum documentary went to air one week later on 10 April 1996, and obsequiously tried to draw a Zionist-friendly 'balance' between the hard reality of the Worldwide News source tapes recorded on 17 April 1984, and the forged 'student' video tape put to air by the BBC back in 1985. Fulcrum was powerless to claim that Yvonne Fletcher was shot from the Libyan Embassy, because ballistic experts had proved that to be rubbish, so had to rely on a lame-duck piece of propaganda, in which it used the 'student' tape [which it already knew was forged], to try and make the British public believe that the 'terrorist' Libyans had fired two long bursts of machine gun fire from their Embassy, while Yvonne herself was killed by a silenced pistol round fired from somewhere entirely different.

In common with all Zionist disinformation ploys, Fulcrum 'hinted' that Yvonne was probably shot from an MI5 [Security Service] listening post inside 3 St. James Square, which was clearly impossible, as Fulcrum knew very well. But by subtly accusing MI5 of the crime, the Zionists hoped to deflect attention away from themselves. Think about this people, think about it very carefully. If you are the Security Service and accused of brutally murdering a police officer in the execution of her duties in St. James Square, your automatic knee jerk reaction will be to defend yourself against the false accusation, rather than make any strenuous attempts to track down those who made the false accusation in the first place.

Things then went relatively quiet again, give or take a suspicious death here and there, until late 1998 when I received yet another high-ranking visitor from London. It seems safe to name this particular gentleman, because he very properly made an appointment through Interpol and the Australian Federal Police, placing his visit very much in the public domain. Detective Chief Superintendent John Bunn of Scotland Yard's Anti-Terrorist Branch turned out to be an imposing and extremely courteous senior officer, with an apparently genuine interest in getting to the bottom of the Yvonne Fletcher case.

We discussed the fresh evidence in some detail, and he even asked if I knew about the silenced pistol the media claimed was imported from Berlin to shoot WPC Fletcher. I laughed aloud at this ridiculous fabricated story, and John Bunn allowed himself a modest throaty chuckle, though it was appropriately subdued. Then it was back to London, where Detective Chief Superintendent Bunn's political masters apparently did not approve of what he had to tell them. Within a few short months John Bunn was investigating dead bodies in Kosovo, which is strange work indeed for a man normally more at home investigating live and sometimes very dangerous terrorists.

Once again things went quiet for a while, but late last year with the Zionists rapidly losing ground on all fronts, especially in Iraq, the shakers and movers started looking over their shoulders. Twenty years ago when they ordered the murder of WPC Yvonne Fletcher in order to usher in a new age of hatred against Islam, it must have seemed that nothing could stop them; that they were invincible and would rule supreme for a thousand years. Now all that has suddenly changed, and the Zionist knew they could easily face a War Crimes Tribunal within their own lifetimes.

It was time to clear up a few loose ends, in particular that especially nasty loose end called Yvonne Fletcher. Unlike the tens of thousands of civilians they have slaughtered in the Middle East, this single murder is one the Zionists cannot simply sweep under a carpet, or laugh off in a bar. And the reason for this is the same reason they had her killed back in 1984. WPC Yvonne Fletcher was an unarmed police officer murdered on duty, and the penalty for that heinous crime was and still is death by hanging. Unfortunately for them, nowadays it is looking increasingly likely that Zionists rather than Libyans will face the inevitable lonely walk to the gallows.

The wheel has turned full circle, and Tony Blair has now been ordered to extract a "confession" from the Libyans, in the fervent hope that this will somehow make the Zionists' own heinous crime invisible. Naturally it will not do so, and even a demonstrably stupid Prime Minister like Blair should have enough brains to steer well clear of this one. Of course he did not shoot Yvonne Fletcher himself, and is therefore not liable to any form of punishment in an British court of law for this particular crime.

So what is the problem? From where I am sitting, images appear of others who did not actually shoot Yvonne Fletcher, but who nonetheless conspired to conceal the truth from the British public, thereby deliberately undermining national security by giving safe haven and sustenance to a crazed bunch of foreign mercenaries. We will never know for certain whether Frank Maier and the others died by accident or by design, though we can be sure that the heavy .45 caliber slug fired into Niko Jerkuic's heart was not a mistake.

Now is probably the time to exercise extreme caution, and not be drawn into Zionist vilification campaigns against nations in the Middle East, especially not Libya where Yvonne Fletcher is concerned. Blair and other Zionist lackeys ought to be far more aware that Zionism itself is failing, and they should more readily comprehend the likely consequences of becoming caught up in the lethal undertow when justice is finally applied. Those Zionists and their lackeys who eventually escape the conventional law courts, may not be able to place themselves beyond the extra-judicial reach of those who regard themselves as legitimate guardians of British and American national security.

Technical Appendix.

The continuous television video sound track records the crowd chanting, followed by a bullet strike on a human body, followed in turn by the sounds of three equally-spaced very fast shots. By far the most important point proved by the noise is that the sound-man located directly outside the Libyan Embassy recorded the `whump' of the bullet striking Yvonne Fletcher, before it recorded the sound of the three shots being fired. What this means in layman terms is that the bullet which killed her was supersonic, and was fired from a position more distant from the camera's microphone than Yvonne Fletcher herself. This analysis alone proves the shots could not have been fired from the Libyan Embassy under any circumstances.

If any shots were fired from the Libyan Embassy at all, they would have crossed overhead or beside the sound-man before the first bullet hit Yvonne Fletcher, i.e. his microphone would have recorded a different sound sequence: first a single shot, then the bullet impact, then shots two and three - whether the bullets were supersonic or not. There is absolutely no trace of this sequence on the audio, which also destroys the claim made at the coronial inquest that two 9-mm Sterling sub-machine guns fired at the same time from the Libyan Embassy. The professional television audio proves in absolute scientific terms that no shots were fired from the Embassy, nor from any other building on the eastern side of St James Square that day.

The camera positioned outside the Embassy panned left and right, showing demonstrators massed along the pavement on the inner square. When the shots were fired, this camera zoomed in and filmed the demonstrators falling sideways to the ground towards the camera's left. So their physical response was to shrapnel and noise from the opposite direction: exactly the line of fire from 8 St James. The massive kinetic energy and inertia of the high velocity assault round fired at her from 8 St James Square, knocked Yvonne Fletcher to the ground in precisely the same direction as the demonstrators, once again proving the direct line of fire. The second TV camera at 7 St James then zooms in to show Yvonne Fletcher rolling from side to side on the road, dying for the greater good of the Zionist "international community".

It is no great secret that many embassies legally store weapons for use in self defence, which are normally limited to handguns loaded with jacketed or solid lead bullets of standard military type, normally 9-mm parabellum, designed to remain intact and not expand on entry to the body. In the case of the 9 millimeter 115 grain bullet fired by defensive pistols, and sub-machine guns such as the Sterling, energy falls from 341 foot-pounds at the muzzle, to 241 foot-pounds at 100 yards. Quite enough to cause serious injury, but rarely death if hit in the upper right back at fifty yards. Conversely, the energy from high velocity 7.62-mm burst-fire assault rifles such as the Belgian FN or German Heckler and Koch 51, firing a 150-grain standard military round, is a massive 2,288 foot-pounds at 100 yards. Enough to go straight through a policewoman with energy to spare.

The full Fletcher autopsy report will never be made public, but details released at the coronial inquest into her death are sufficient for military experts to prove that a 9-mm parabellum bullet fired by a Sterling could not have been responsible for the terrible damage inflicted, even at point-blank range. After entering WPC Fletcher's upper right back the single bullet damaged the right lung, completely destroyed both lobes of the liver, shredded the large inferior vena cava leading to the left ventricle of the heart, caused damage to the spine and cut the pancreas in half, before completing its 12 inch track through her body and exiting below the left rib cage, continuing on to cause further injuries to Fletcher's left elbow. Massive injuries like these sustained through 12 inches of human tissue, can only be caused by the colossal hydrostatic impact and inertia of a full bore (7.62-mm) high velocity assault round.

To rule out any further argument on this point, tissue tests were conducted in Australia during 1995-1996 to establish the maximum penetration of 9-mm parabellum rounds in pig carcasses. At its maximum muzzle velocity of 1,350 feet per second, the 115 grain bullet fired at 50 yards penetrated only 6 inches, with no hydrostatic effect at all on wet organs such as the liver. Then, to counter ridiculous Zionist insinuations from London that Yvonne might have been killed by a 'silenced' pistol or sub-machine gun, more 115-grain rounds were downloaded to a slower (silenced) velocity of 900 feet per second. At 50 yards these puny rounds penetrated only 1.5 inches. Further tests established in absolute scientific terms that the minimum round needed to inflict Fletcher's hydrostatic injuries and penetrate 12 inches of tissue, was a bullet with a minimum weight of 150 grains, fired at a velocity in excess of 2,750 feet per second. Such rounds can only be chambered and burst-fired by full-bore high velocity assault weapons.

There are three high velocity rifle rounds specifically designed to cause the savage fatal injuries suffered by Yvonne Fletcher that day, the worst of which is the `petal' fragible, an assassination bullet designed to enter the body before its nose separates into several razor-sharp high velocity splinters, leaving the heavy base of the bullet to continue on a straight track through the body. If three petal frags were fired, with only one striking Fletcher, the remaining two would explode on impact with the paving, hurling razor-sharp metal shrapnel fragments and hard granite chippings in a low arc towards the anti-Qadhafi demonstrators standing behind the barriers just beyond Yvonne Fletcher's position. Quite enough to injure a large number of bystanders but not kill them, which is exactly what happened at 10:19:08 hrs on 17 April 1984.

Multiple Internet Bans Prove Accuracy of Vialls Investigations

After being banned by "Rumor Mill News" and other minor American web sites, and deliberately undermined by an article on Rense.com, I came under direct attack by two of the biggest IT multinationals in the world. Despite the fact that my 'foundation' web site at http://geocities.com/vialls/ was a paid service charged to my credit card, it was abruptly disconnected by Yahoo without just cause, and without compensation of the monies already extracted from me. Legally and morally this constitutes fraud and theft by Yahoo, a company which in the past has attempted to take the moral high ground.

Within two days of this I was suddenly banned by PayPal, once again without just cause and without compensation. In some ways the illegal PayPal action was worse, because although Yahoo had managed to cause severe damage by removing my "Home Page" and thus the links to every one of my hundreds of other pages across the Internet as a whole, the fraudulent Yahoo action was essentially restricted to me as a single individual. Not so with PayPal. The account contained donations from Americans intended to help with my American web sites and other associated Internet expenses, which can now no longer be used because those donations have all been confiscated [yes, I did write confiscated] by PayPal.

There is no doubt that those who ultimately control Yahoo, PayPal and others, know my exact financial circumstances, probably down to my very last cent as a near-destitute disability pensioner. Equally there is no doubt the coordinated Internet 'strike' was designed to prove who is the most powerful bully on the block, and to convince me that there is no longer any point trying to fight the obscene 'alternative Zionist truth', which nowadays spews unchecked from every bodily orifice of the establishment media.

It would be a bald lie for me to pretend the coordinated Internet strike missed its target, for it did not. The Paypal attack in particular was especially damaging and humiliating, because the account also contained the proceeds from the sale of several small personal items, sacrificed in the far more important interests of truth. Rest assured that if I ever manage to uncover the identies of the perverted Zionists responsible for this inexcusable intrusion into my personal affairs, their collective demise will be as slow and agonizing as possible.

In summary I am down but not yet out, and can only ask for your financial support one last time as I struggle to disperse the truth across the length and breadth of the Internet, where it will hopefully be safe from those currently hell-bent on suppressing human dignity and in particular the First Amendment. The "donate" button below now leads to a page containing details of alternative online donation systems which I can only hope will work better that PayPal [How could they be worse?]. Any small sum that you cana afford towards web site expenses would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for caring.

During the years that Internet surfers have been reading my reports about the cold-blooded murder of policewoman Yvonne Fletcher, all have been hampered by their shared inability to access the orignal source video and sound track, on which the British Government and media based their exotic and wildly inaccurate lies about 'Libyan Guilt'. And just to make sure this could never happen by accident at any time in the future, all archived copies of the BBC Television news footage broadcast on the day of the murder, were quietly gathered up and burned.

Well, almost all copies. More than a year before the British external intelligence service removed the material for ever, I was passed an archive copy for safekeeping in Australia - well outside the reach of American, Israeli and British spooks. At that time there was little I could do with it other than extract still photographs, because I did not own a television station, and lacked the scientific skills needed to convert this critical material into a format that could be viewed or listened to by anyone on the Internet.

Perhaps taking pity on me, video and audio experts offered their assistance, and have produced truly breathtaking results, especially in the audio sense. Remember that the professional video cameras located in St James Square that day, recorded the entire sequence of the shooting, and thus recorded the stark reality that there was only one single very dense burst of fire. No stylish "rat-a-tat-tat" of the Sterling sub-machinegun later fabricated by the BBC in 1985, and no hissing noises of ridiculously puny silenced pistol rounds alluded to by Channel 4 and Fulcrum Productions during 1996 and 1997.

To make this point very clear, the experts have converted the actual BBC Television news footage so that it can be played through every PC in the world. There has been no editing of this news footage at all, meaning that what you see and hear is exactly what millions of people in Great Britain saw and heard on the six o'clock news late on 17 April 1984. There was only a single dense burst of gunfire - period.

There are two links different to the Internet video at the bottom of this update, depending on whether your personal computer is equipped with 'Windows Media Player' or 'Real Media Player'. If you are not sure which one you have, click on the Windows Media Player link first. Be prepared for a long download [between 5 and 8 minutes over a dial-up modem] because this is real-time film footage which takes up a lot of memory. The media player will then open and play the film clip automatically.

The separate audio analysis is truly spectacular, because it reveals for the first time ever in continuous form, that the dense "single shot" that the British Government and media continually referred and still refer to, is in reality a 3-shot burst folllowed by echoes. The commentator first plays the burst in real time, then slows it down and points out the three shots, before slowing it down still further and pointing out the three distinctly separate shots again.

The first shot hit and killed WPC Yvonne Fletcher, while the second and third exploded on the inner pavement of St James Square, their fragments injuring ten demonstrators imported from Manchester for the occasion. These are the only three shots fired on 17 April 1984 (confirmed by the real-time BBC video), meaning that everything else you have been told about gunfire that day in St James Square, is a very creative package of obscene lies, forced down your throats over the years by Zionist lackeys in London, who some day soon may finally be brought to justice.

BBC Television News, London, 17 April 1984

Windows Media Click left button, Real Media Click Right Button

Detailed Audio Analysis of 3-Shot Burst in BBC News

Click on the link below, and this clip will automatically load into

your default mp3 audio player (normally Windows Media)